Welcome To DMT Social

DMT SOCIAL & CO. ADVOCATES



Consultation

Call Us :  +91-88662 13535; 079-48011546

Our Services

We offer many services regarding your legal needs.

Services

Family laws

Maintenance flows from the concept of marriage. The question of maintenance is not dependent upon the divorce proceedings. Even before the case of divorce is filed, Indian Law provides the right to claim maintenance through the medium of the Court.

If we look at the entire gamut of Indian matrimonial law, we will find that the provisions for maintenance are available in following statues in case of Hindu Marriage:

  • Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code( Cr.P.C.)
  • Section 20 of Protection of women from Domestic Violence
  • Section 18 of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act
  • Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act
  • Section 25 of Hindu Marriage Act

A general conjoint reading of the aforesaid provision makes it amply clear that the objective of law is to providemaintenance to the Spouse who does not have sufficient means to maintain himself/herself by the one who has capacity and means to provide maintenance. The object is salutary and the scheme appreciating.

A cursory look at the past practices and belief is a clear cut indication of the fact that it is the man who has been bestowed with the power, capacity and capability to look after the family. Womanhood is expected to take care of the domestic chores while men were held responsible for all financial support to the family.

Law is expected to change with time. So, when women starting assuming proactive roles in the society, then maintenance law in India took care of this fact and brought the working men and women in the same pedestal. In number of cases, it was held that Husband is entitled to maintenance if he does not have sufficient means and the wife is working.

Criminal Laws

In almost every legal proceeding, the parties are required to adhere to important rules known as evidentiary standards and burdens of proof. These rules determine which party is responsible for putting forth enough evidence to either prove or defeat a particular claim and the amount of evidence necessary to accomplish that goal.

The burden of proof determines which party is responsible for putting forth evidence and the level of evidence they must provide in order to prevail on their claim. In most cases, the plaintiff (the party bringing the claim) has the burden of proof.

The burden of proof has two components. First, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of production, which has also been referred to as the burden of going forward. As the terms suggest, this burden requires the plaintiff to put forth evidence in the form of witness testimony, documents, or objects. After the plaintiff presents his or her case-in-chief, the burden of production shifts to the defendant, who then has the opportunity to provide evidence either rebutting the plaintiff’s evidence or supporting the defendant’s own arguments.

Dispute Resolution

  • Litigation Due diligence
  • Cross Border Litigation
  • Civil, Corporate, IP and Commercial Litigation
  • Appellate practice
  • International Arbitration
  • Enforcement of Foreign judgments, awards and decrees

Banking and debt recovery

  • Banking Law & Regulations
  • Secured Finance, Mortgages, Pledges, Securitisation etc.
  • DRT and DRAT Litigation
  • Securitisation Litigation
  • Negotiable Instruments
  • Co-operative Banking
  • Banking and RBI(Reserve Bank of India) Compliances
  • Transactions related to Bank Guarantees, Letter of Credit and Bank loan

Intellectual property rights and IT

  • Cyber Law, Software Development agreements
  • Drafting, filing and registration of Copyrights and Trademarks
  • IP Litigation
  • IP agreements
  • Infringement and passing off
  • Data protection
  • I T and IP Portfolio Management

Company law, Merger and Acquisition

  • Company Formation
  • Corporate Financing (Equity, Debt and Asset)
  • Private Equity
  • Due diligence
  • Bankruptcy and Winding up
  • Regulatory Compliances
  • International Commercial Transactions
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Foreign Collaboration
  • Joint Venture
  • Technology Transfer
  • Competition Law

Negotiable Instruments Law

An alteration is said to be material if it alters the effect of the instrument. It means an unauthorized change in an instrument that purports to modify in any respect the obligation of a party or an unauthorized addition of words or numbers or other change to an incomplete instrument relating to the obligation of a party. In other words, a material alteration is one which changes the items which are required to be stated under Section 1 of the Negotiable Instrument Law.